Thursday, July 28, 2011
We see that Kevin Randle spices up his blog by posting regular Roswell tainted posts.
Roswell is a “drug” -- and he’s one of its dealers.
Some present and former visitors to this blog go to Randle’s blog for their Roswell fix.
One can find CDA there, Sourcerer (Don), and the heavily-dosed David Rudiak, among others, immersed in the drug-induced fog that has become Roswell.
Stupifyingly redundant comments are grist of the blog, and nothing of value ensues, ever.
When we provide a post about Roswell, usually from researcher Anthony Bragalia, it, at least, has something new appended to it…something unknown and pertinent.
Randle just likes to fill his blog with a raft of comments, and he doesn’t care if they have an intelligent value or not.
He just likes filler, and Roswell always provides it.
Roswell is intriguing, but well-mined by UFO hobbyists. Yet, some find the incident necessary for their online existence; they need it to feel alive, and intellectual by regurgitating old Roswell detritus, over and over, again.
It’s embarrassing….that is, the “addiction” makes the rest of us who are fascinated by the UFO mystery look as if we are part and parcel of the “addicted” Roswellians, even as we try to distance ourselves from Roswell, just to get on with trying to explain the extant UFO enigma, the phenomenon itself, not the myth and corrupted event that attracts some like moths to flames, when they should know better.
Monday, July 25, 2011
I’m rather surprised at how many of the visitors to this blog, some of whom are my UFO friends, profess to be atheists.
I shan’t name them, but you know who most of them are. They are not “in-the-closet” atheists by any means.
At the same time, many physicists and scientists, generally, say they are atheists also. But their actions belie such a declaration.
At a subliminal level, science, especially physicists, are believers in a supreme deity and all their mathematical machinations and theories are a search for that deity.
Watch a group of NASA scientists when a space probe or experiment is successful. They clap and get giddy, much like fundamentalist Christians at a church rally when someone is cured by an evangelist.
But that superficial observation is bolstered by what science, physicists mostly, spend their lives looking for – the meaning of life – the physical laws of nature – one clue to is the Higgs boson, that elusive particle that is as evanescent as the God of believers but still pursued as diligently as believers and theologians pursue proof of their God.
The money and time spent in the search or Higgs’ particle – at the Fermi lab in Chicago and the newer Hadron Collider in Europe – is nothing more than the pursuit of a footprint of God.
The whole structure of quantum physics and classical physics, since Aristotle through Newton up to today’s theoretical physicists’ obsession with the fundamental laws of nature – God’s principles – is based on a proof for God, no matter how that search is described.
Yet, why do my ufological friends insist that they, too, are atheists? I think it has to do with a desire to mimic science. That science is in a state of denial about its belief in God doesn’t register with the UFO group that professes not to believe. They haven’t thought it through nor have they understood the charade that science, and physicists have foisted on themselves and the public too.
That there is an intelligence at work in the Universe is palpable, even if that intelligence is marred by a psychotic-like behavior.
The UFO clique that insists there is no such intelligence – no God (a term I’m using as a rubric for discussion) – strikes me as incomprehensibly shallow.
I accept that science, physicists mostly, are profoundly shallow – else why do they insist that mathematics portray reality better than any other form of communication – a matter to deal with, again, upcoming – and science is so focused on its subliminal, disguised obsession that it has devolved into a cult of believing non-believers who can’t be trusted to come up with an outlay of truth.
That the denial of a God by physicists is pathological is a given in these quarters. That ufologists say they are atheists is a ploy to appear scientific and foolish, intellectually.
But that’s, as Gilles Fernandez, the French psychologist says, ufology.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
We’ve touched on this previously with several blog postings, but a reading of The Black Hole War by Leonard Susskind [Little, Brown and Company, NY, 2008] allows for an extrapolation of our views.
The whole tenor of Susskind’s discussion of black holes and his consternation with Stephen Hawking’s once held view about black holes and information (the loss of it) revolves around the idea that quantum theory applies to black holes….something macroscopic rather than microscopic, which is generally the province of quantum reality.
Large elements of reality have always been eschewed by quantum physicists, but Susskind, and others, apply quantum mechanics to black holes, which are an egregious element of large reality:
“Jacob Bekenstein [a noted Israeli physicist]…had a sense that black holes had something profound to say about the laws of nature. He was particularly interested in how black holes might fit together with the principles of Quantum Mechanics and thermodynamics that had so preoccupied Einstein.” [Page 147]
So we contend, hypothetically, that UFOs may be quantum artifacts – large quantum particles as it were.
UFOs mimic several aspects of quantum theory: the indeterminacy of location, observation (measurement) of UFOs affect them, and their reality is hypothetical, not actual in practical, classical terms.
Quantum artifacts behave in strange, quirky ways, as you know. UFOs behave similarly.
UFOs, more often than not, disappear when observed, suddenly rather than gradually, according to most UFO sighting-reports.
The Hungarian physicist Eugene Wigner [1902-1995] said this:
“When we become conscious of something, we bring about the crucial collapse of the wave function, so that the perplexing mixed states of [reality] disappear.” [Page 148, Introducing Quantum Theory, Totem Books, NY, 1997].
UFOs behave, usually, as waves rather than particles, but they have had substance, seemingly, as trace elements of them have been adequately reported; however, they behave more readily as waves (of light), especially in current times.
As for quantum, Niels Bohr said this:
“Whether an object behaves as particle or wave depends on your choice of apparatus for looking at it.” [Page 160, Ibid]
Bohrs insight applies to Paul Kimball’s favorite UFO event, the so-called RB-47 sighting of 1957.
Erwin Schrodinger (of dead/live cat fame) conjectured that particles – let us insert UFOs here – do not exist at all, but are just a “superimposition of waves” [Page 140, Ibid]
While quantum mechanics/theory is abstruse for many, we think it may be a vehicle -- a methodology – for study of the UFO phenomenon.
We’ll continue this hypothetical thrust here (and elsewhere)…..
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
We consider Paul Kimball a friend, and we follow his blog and Facebook musings regularly.
Lately he has been absorbed by what he sees as synchronicity-like happenings that afflict him.
We think he and his followers might like to see an alternative view.
Click here for a precis on Apophenia